| Table A.5.12 | Employment in the Processing Industry | |||||||||
| NUTS II | NUTS III | Female | Male | TOTAL | ||||||
| FT | PT | SE% | Total | FT | PT | SE% | Total | |||
| Trentino Alto Adige | Bolzano-Bozen | 3 | 2 | 75 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 78 | 1 | 6 |
| Trento | 3 | 1 | 50 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 70 | 1 | 5 | |
| Friuli Venezia Giulia | Gorizia | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Pordenone | 108 | 36 | 0 | 144 | 20 | 1 | 80 | 21 | 165 | |
| Trieste | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | |
| Udine | 27 | 9 | 80 | 36 | 6 | 0 | 63 | 6 | 42 | |
| Veneto | Belluno | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Padova | 27 | 11 | 75 | 38 | 6 | 1 | 79 | 6 | 44 | |
| Rovigo | 121 | 48 | 67 | 169 | 23 | 2 | 71 | 25 | 194 | |
| Treviso | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 80 | 2 | 2 | |
| Venezia | 166 | 66 | 67 | 232 | 32 | 3 | 38 | 34 | 266 | |
| Verona | 138 | 55 | 80 | 193 | 26 | 2 | 88 | 28 | 221 | |
| Vicenza | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Emilia Romagna | Bologna | 126 | 33 | 50 | 159 | 22 | 1 | 79 | 23 | 182 |
| Ferrara | 82 | 21 | 40 | 103 | 14 | 1 | 75 | 15 | 118 | |
| Forli'-Cesena | 21 | 5 | 50 | 26 | 4 | 0 | 75 | 4 | 30 | |
| Modena | 7 | 2 | 75 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 73 | 2 | 11 | |
| Parma | 39 | 10 | 0 | 49 | 7 | 0 | 80 | 7 | 56 | |
| Piacenza | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Ravenna | 12 | 3 | 57 | 15 | 3 | 0 | 75 | 3 | 18 | |
| Reggio nell'Emilia | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Rimini | 13 | 3 | 0 | 16 | 3 | 0 | 75 | 3 | 19 | |
| Marche | Ancona | 100 | 13 | 67 | 113 | 16 | 1 | 80 | 17 | 130 |
| Ascoli Piceno | 203 | 34 | 0 | 237 | 31 | 3 | 0 | 34 | 271 | |
| Macerata | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Pesaro e Urbino | 38 | 4 | 0 | 42 | 6 | 0 | 83 | 6 | 48 | |
| Umbria | Perugia | 41 | 17 | 67 | 58 | 8 | 2 | 67 | 9 | 67 |
| Terni | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Molise | Campobasso | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Isernia | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Abruzzo | Chieti | 9 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 12 |
| L'Aquila | 27 | 2 | 0 | 29 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 34 | |
| Pescara | 0 | 0 | 75 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 75 | 1 | 1 | |
| Teramo | 189 | 13 | 67 | 202 | 26 | 3 | 75 | 29 | 231 | |
| Puglia | Bari | 57 | 13 | 55 | 67 | 9 | 1 | 48 | 10 | 77 |
| Brindisi | 41 | 8 | 18 | 49 | 7 | 1 | 42 | 8 | 57 | |
| Foggia | 18 | 4 | 50 | 21 | 4 | 0 | 46 | 4 | 25 | |
| Lecce | 32 | 6 | 45 | 38 | 5 | 1 | 55 | 6 | 44 | |
| Taranto | 15 | 3 | 27 | 18 | 3 | 0 | 45 | 3 | 21 | |
| Basilicata | Matera | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Potenza | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total area lot 13 | 1665 | 422 | 47 | 2084 | 292 | 26 | 62 | 316 | 2400 | |
| Italy | 4442 | 1166 | 47 | 5605 | 740 | 102 | 60 | 843 | 6447 | |
| Source: Irepa estimate from data of "Censimento Intermedio dell'industria e dei servizi", Istat | ||||||||||
| Year: 1997 | ||||||||||
| Lowest regional divisional of data available: in order to obtain an estimate of total employment and distribuition between male and female, figures of "Censimento intermedio delle industrie e dei servizi" has been used. For the estimate of the full and part time employment and a percentage of the self -employment present, Istat data referring to the research on employment in the agricultural sector by provinces has been used. | ||||||||||